Nowadays wildlife conservation talk is common practice. Thirty years ago, my father tells me, people, young people especially, didn’t think twice before shooting a bird or gunning down an animal. They didn’t have to bother because there were hardly any laws protecting wildlife, and the animals were a lot more in number. There was no awareness either.
At that time ‘development’ was measured only in terms of population growth and polluting industries. Thanks to that, young people today find themselves living in a highly polluted and dirty environment, cut off more or less completely from nature and wildlife. This has had the paradoxical effect of stimulating their interest in wildlife and its conservation. Larger numbers of youngsters are ready to work to save wildlife from harm or extinction.
For instance, a
lot of youth today prefer to do bird watching or camping in the forest, instead
of visiting zoos, or keeping birds in cages. In
There are
basically two wildlife groups in
The second group
is called
Both these groups have been doing a substantial amount of work, and what I really admire about it is that almost all of it has been self funded. Their motivation has also been their own. They all come from different backgrounds, and none of them has parents as tolerant as mine! Yet they have all managed to follow their interests, and their drive for protecting wildlife has remained undiminished.
Nirmal told me
some time ago that they had finished over 150 snake talks in schools, colleges,
villages and clubs. That’s a very good number, and so is
Camps and nature
trips also held by both these groups add to the awareness and interest about
wildlife among the people of
Goans are
notorious for keeping wild animals in cages as ‘pets’. Recently I was taking a
walk in my village and outside one house I happened to see a rabbit housed in a
cage, 1 foot by ½ half foot in dimensions. Some people can have no feelings
whatsoever. Keeping parrots and squirrels in tiny cages is a common practice
still found all over
On one occasion, we conducted a raid on a person who had confined a crocodile inside a fibre glass water tank. The crocodile had long since out grown it, and was forced to remain curled inside the circular tank. The list of cruelties is unending, but thanks to the raids conducted on such people by wildlife groups, a lot of these animals have been seized, rehabilitated and released back in the wild.
Green Cross used
to even tackle circuses. Because of their resistance, hardly any circuses now
come to
But we do have our problems.
Starting with the issue of raids on snake charmers – though these raids have lessened the number of snake charmers at the flea market – we have never had permanent results. The reason: though the snakes were confiscated, no action was ever taken against the snake charmers themselves. The whole act of raiding in the end became so routine that the snake charmers began to recognise us from a distance. By the time we approached them some of them would even have their snakes ready and neatly packed up for us! If some of these snake charmers were to be jailed for even a day by the forest department, all snake charmers would have been discouraged from this cruel and illegal practice. The snake charmers couldn’t care less. I estimate the average cost of procuring the snake to be not more than Rs 100, whereas their earnings for just one day at the flea market could easily fetch them a Rs 500 net profit. In fact I am beginning to think that the whole exercise backfired in a way because though the number of snake charmers decreased, the turnover of snakes in the baskets of the remaining guys, probably increased.
Our root problem,
everyone agrees, is lack of organisation. Living in
Neil also mentions that too many activists are involved in too many activities. Yet no one is specialized in a single field. Organised division of tasks would greatly improve our efficiency.
One other issue that is hidden away like a skeleton in the closet is rivalry. Most of the groups stick to themselves, are secretive about the information they have and about the activities they carry out. This I attribute to individual insecurity. Each person/group fears that if information is shared, the other will get the better of them. Very often groups contain individuals dominated by one religion only.
I find this really
silly. First of all we are still so few in number. So to be divided leaves us
with even less strength. I strongly feel that we should put our differences
aside. We could still have our own separate identities, but that shouldn’t mean
that we stop helping each other. All groups in